aimosti

DPYD: the gene behind severe fluorouracil and capecitabine toxicity

DPYD is the clearest example in pharmacogenomics of a test that exists because people died without it. Reduced enzyme activity turns a standard chemotherapy dose into an overdose, and the variants that cause it are individually rare but collectively common enough that Europe now recommends testing before treatment.

Also known as: dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, DPD.

What DPYD does

The gene makes dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, usually shortened to DPD, which is the enzyme that breaks down the fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy drugs. Most of a dose of fluorouracil is disposed of this way rather than acting on the tumour. If DPD activity is low, that disposal route narrows and the drug lingers, so the same infusion delivers far more exposure than intended. The toxicity that follows hits the gut lining, the bone marrow and the mucous membranes, and it can be fatal.

The metabolizer groups

DPYD is scored rather than typed. Each known reduced-function variant carries an activity value, the values a person carries are summed, and the total falls into a band: normal metabolizer at the top, intermediate in the middle, poor metabolizer at the bottom. Unlike the star-allele genes there is no long catalogue of named haplotypes doing the work here. A small number of variants carry nearly all of the clinical signal, and everything else reads as normal function.

Medications where it matters

fluorouracil (5-FU)

Fluorouracil is given intravenously in colorectal, breast, gastric and head-and-neck cancer, often as part of a combination regimen. It is the drug the DPYD guidance was built around, and the dose reductions below are among the largest CPIC publishes for any gene.

If your result isPublished CPIC guidance
Intermediate MetabolizerPer CPIC (A): "Reduce starting dose by 50% followed by titration of dose based on toxicity or therapeutic drug monitoring (if available)."
Normal MetabolizerPer CPIC (A): "Based on genotype, there is no indication to change dose or therapy. Use label-recommended dosage and administration."
Poor MetabolizerPer CPIC (A): "Avoid use of 5-fluorouracil or 5-fluorouracil prodrug-based regimens. In the event, based on clinical advice, alternative agents are not considered a suitable therapeutic option, 5-fluorouracil should be administered at a strongly reduced dose with early therapeutic drug monitoring."

capecitabine (Xeloda)

Capecitabine is a tablet that the body converts into fluorouracil, so it inherits the same problem. People sometimes assume an oral drug is the gentler option; for a DPYD intermediate or poor metabolizer it is the same exposure by a different route.

If your result isPublished CPIC guidance
Intermediate MetabolizerPer CPIC (A): "Reduce starting dose by 50% followed by titration of dose based on toxicity or therapeutic drug monitoring (if available)."
Normal MetabolizerPer CPIC (A): "Based on genotype, there is no indication to change dose or therapy. Use label-recommended dosage and administration."
Poor MetabolizerPer CPIC (A): "Avoid use of 5-fluorouracil or 5-fluorouracil prodrug-based regimens. In the event, based on clinical advice, alternative agents are not considered a suitable therapeutic option, 5-fluorouracil should be administered at a strongly reduced dose with early therapeutic drug monitoring."

Is this in your raw DNA file?

DPYD is one of the pharmacogenes Aimosti reads from a plain consumer file. The two variants that matter most, rs3918290 and rs67376798, are single positions rather than haplotypes, and consumer genotyping arrays commonly carry them, so the gene appears in the standard report rather than in Deep Read alone. The limit is real and worth stating plainly: a chip tests the variants it was designed to test. Other reduced-function DPYD variants exist, they are not on the array, and a file that carries one will read as normal function. A normal DPYD result from consumer data means the tested variants were absent, not that DPD activity is proven normal. Before fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy, that distinction is the whole ballgame, and the test to rely on is the clinical one your oncology service orders.

A genotyping chip reads only a few hundred thousand pre-selected positions, about 0.02% of your genome, chosen for common variation. It does not sequence the rest, so it cannot find the rare or novel pathogenic variants the clinical and carrier modules look for: a “no finding” from chip data means “this chip never looked”, far more so than with whole-genome sequencing. Chip data suits common-variant traits, pharmacogenomic tag SNPs, and haplogroup ancestry, not clinical or carrier screening.

See how Aimosti reports it

Common questions

Is DPYD in my 23andMe or AncestryDNA raw data?

The two most important variants usually are, and Aimosti reads them from the file you already have. What a chip cannot do is rule out the reduced-function variants it was never designed to test, so a normal result here is narrower than it looks.

I am starting chemotherapy next week. Can I use this instead of a clinical test?

No. Use the clinical test, and if your service has not mentioned one, ask. European guidance recommends DPYD testing before fluoropyrimidine treatment, and a clinical laboratory result is what an oncologist can act on. A re-analysis of a consumer file is not that.

What does an intermediate metabolizer result actually change?

In practice it changes the starting dose and the intensity of monitoring, which is what the table above sets out. It does not usually mean the drug is off the table. Poor metabolizer is the result that pushes toward a different regimen entirely.

Nobody in my family has had a problem with chemotherapy. Does that settle it?

Only if a close relative has actually been treated with a fluoropyrimidine. Most carriers never meet these drugs, so the variant passes through a family silently for generations and shows up the first time someone is treated.

Sources

Written by Raine Laurila. Last reviewed 2026-07-22.

This page is educational and is not medical advice. It restates published CPIC guidance and does not replace a conversation with your oncology team.