ClinVar 2026-07: 951 records inside our regions changed classification since 2026-05. What changed
Sample report Support Log in
aimostı Check your file

Learn Guide

Hemochromatosis in your raw DNA: C282Y, H63D and the penetrance puzzle

C282Y and H63D, the two HFE variants behind most hereditary hemochromatosis, are read by 23andMe's health report and sit in many raw DNA downloads. Reading the letters is the easy part. What two copies of C282Y mean depends on which study you ask, because each counted something different, and the published answers run from under 1 percent to more than half.

Key takeaways

  • Most hereditary hemochromatosis in people of northern European ancestry comes from two copies of one HFE variant, C282Y. The other variant consumer reports read, H63D, is common and much weaker[2, 20].
  • Published penetrance for two copies of C282Y runs from under 1 percent to 56 percent of men, because studies counted different things: symptoms, documented disease or a diagnosis in a record. A raised iron level is commoner still[14, 15, 16, 17].
  • Women with two copies are affected later and less often than men: 40.5 against 56.4 percent diagnosed by 80 in UK Biobank[16].
  • In UK Biobank, one copy of each variant, or two copies of H63D, showed no excess of any outcome studied once the analysis allowed for multiple testing[16].
  • H63D changes a C to a G, a pair that reads the same on both DNA strands, so a chip export cannot prove what its H63D letters mean. Our report reads H63D only from sequencing files.
  • Finns carry C282Y about half as often as other Europeans, 3.6 against 6.5 percent of chromosomes in gnomAD: roughly 1 in 790 Finns with two copies against 1 in 240, by our estimate[24].

Hereditary hemochromatosis (haemochromatosis in British spelling) is iron overload with an inherited cause. The gut keeps taking in iron the body does not need, and because the body has no way to step up its iron losses, the surplus builds up in the liver, pancreas, heart and joints over years[1]. The gene behind most cases was found in 1996. Its discoverers called it HLA-H; it is now HFE. They reported two changes in it, and one, now known as C282Y, was present on both copies of chromosome 6 in 83 percent of 178 patients[2]. The other, H63D, is more common and much weaker. 23andMe's hemochromatosis report reads exactly these two[3].

What HFE does, and what C282Y breaks

The body controls its iron at the point of entry. The liver makes a hormone, hepcidin, that decides how much iron is absorbed from food and how much is released from storage[4]. It acts on ferroportin, the only known exit for iron from a cell, and reduces how much iron it lets out[5]. HFE is one of the proteins the liver uses to sense how much iron is already circulating, and it helps switch hepcidin production on[4].

A ball-and-stick model of the hepcidin molecule, a short chain of amino acids folded into a hairpin, with carbon atoms in grey, nitrogen in blue, oxygen in red, hydrogen in white and sulfur in yellow, and a teal arrow marking one strand of the fold.
Figure 1. Hepcidin, the liver hormone that sets how much iron the gut lets in, as first solved in 2002, Protein Data Bank entry 1M4F[6]. It is 25 amino acids long and held in shape by four bridges between sulfur atoms, shown in yellow. A 2009 study found that the bridges pair up differently from the way this early model has them[7].

C282Y swaps one building block of the HFE protein, the cysteine at position 282, for a tyrosine, and the altered protein no longer reaches the cell surface where it works[4]. With two copies, the liver makes too little hepcidin, ferroportin stays open, and more iron is absorbed from food than the body uses[4, 5]. Every inherited form of hemochromatosis comes down to the same fault: too little hepcidin, or a ferroportin that hepcidin cannot bind[5].

Figure 2. HFE helps the liver judge how much iron is circulating, and hepcidin is the liver's signal to close the gate in the gut wall. With two copies of C282Y less hepcidin is made, the gate lets more iron through, and nothing raises the body's iron losses to match[1, 4, 5].

The surplus collects mainly in the liver, and also in the pancreas and heart[8, 5]. It accumulates slowly: men with the common adult form usually develop symptoms between 40 and 60, women usually after menopause[1]. The first symptoms are vague ones, tiredness, joint pain and abdominal pain; later ones include arthritis, cirrhosis, liver cancer and diabetes[1].

Two variants, six results

Everyone has two copies of HFE, one from each parent, so a file can show none, one or two copies of each variant. The two variants almost never sit on the same copy: in both FinnGen and UK Biobank, nobody with two copies of C282Y also carried H63D, and nobody with two copies of H63D carried C282Y[9]. That leaves six results in practice, and our report gives each its own reading.

Figure 3. The labels and one-line readings are the report's own, generated from the content file and the calling code it runs on. The combinations marked as not seen would need C282Y and H63D on the same copy of chromosome 6[9].

In a raw file the two variants are rows keyed by their reference numbers, rs1800562 for C282Y and rs1799945 for H63D[10, 11]. A chip export gives the two letters it measured at each row. Searching a download for those two numbers finds them if the chip had them, and not every chip does.

Chip export

# rsid      chromosome  position  genotype
rs1799945   6           26091179  CC
rs1800562   6           26093141  AG
Two invented rows in the layout of a 23andMe-style export, with positions on the older GRCh37 assembly[10, 11]. AG at rs1800562 is one copy of C282Y. CC at rs1799945 looks like no H63D, but the next section explains why a chip cannot prove that.

Six terms this article relies on

Homozygous
Two copies of the same variant, one on each copy of the chromosome.
Heterozygous
One copy of a variant. One copy of C282Y is usually called carrier status.
Compound heterozygous
One copy each of two different variants in the same gene; here, one C282Y and one H63D.
Penetrance
The share of people with a genotype who develop the condition, which depends on what is counted as the condition and by what age.
Transferrin saturation
The share of transferrin, the protein that carries iron in the blood, that has iron bound to it.
Ferritin
An iron-storage protein. Its level in the blood is used as a measure of how much iron the body holds.

H63D and the strand problem

DNA has two strands, and each letter pairs with its complement, A with T and C with G. A chip export lists two letters per row and no strand, and genotype data sets are often unclear about which strand they used[12]. For most positions the letters settle it. C282Y changes a G to an A; read from the other strand, the same change is a C to a T. The four letters do not overlap, so a row at that position can only be read one way.

H63D changes a C to a G, and on the other strand that is a G to a C: the same two letters. A row reading CG is one copy of H63D on either strand. The other two rows are the problem. CC means no H63D if the letters are on the reference strand and two copies if they are on the other one, and GG means the reverse. Genotype software treats C/G and A/T positions as ambiguous for this reason[12].

Figure 4. The reference sequence around each variant on GRCh38, with the changed letter in the middle and the opposite strand beneath it[10, 11]. Only H63D's change is a letter pair that is its own complement.

Because a chip export cannot show which strand its letters came from, our report reads H63D from chip data only when the row says CG, the one genotype that means the same on both strands: one copy. A CC or GG row is marked as not examined, never as absent. That matters most for one copy of C282Y. With H63D unread, a chip cannot tell one copy of C282Y from one copy of each variant, so the report says the compound result has not been ruled out. Two copies of C282Y stand on their own: H63D cannot change that result.

A sequencing file does not have the problem. Each VCF record carries the reference genome's own letter at its position, beside the alternative[13], so a C to G record at the H63D position has only one reading. A plain VCF lists only differences, so a position with no record is read as the reference letter, which is usually right and never proven; the report labels it as an inference. We have written about what a missing line can hide.

VCF

#CHROM  POS       ID         REF  ALT  GT
chr6    26090951  rs1799945  C    G    0/1
chr6    26092913  rs1800562  G    A    0/1
Two invented records on GRCh38, one copy of each variant, which is the compound result[10, 11]. The columns between ALT and the genotype are left out.

Penetrance for two copies of C282Y: from under 1 to 56 percent

Penetrance is the share of people with a genotype who go on to have the condition. For two copies of C282Y the published figures are far apart, because the condition can be counted at several depths: an iron level above a cut-off, a diagnosis in a medical record, organ damage put down to iron, or symptoms. Each study below counted a different one, in a different group of people, at a different age. The lowest figure came from 41,038 people screened at a US health appraisal clinic, 152 of whom had two copies[14].

Our best estimate is that less than 1% of homozygotes develop frank clinical haemochromatosis.

Beutler and colleagues, The Lancet, 2002[14]

Six years later a Melbourne cohort of 31,192 people of northern European descent, followed for an average of 12 years, found documented iron-overload disease in 28.4 percent of homozygous men[15]. In 2024 a UK Biobank analysis of 451,270 people projected that 56.4 percent of homozygous men would have a hemochromatosis diagnosis by 80, and concluded that homozygotes had more illness than earlier studies had shown[16].

Table 1. Two copies of C282Y in five population studies
StudyHomozygotesWhat was countedMenWomen
HEIRS screening, USA and Canada, 2005227 not yet diagnosedFerritin above 300 µg/L in men or 200 µg/L in women, at screening88%57%
UK Biobank, 20242,902A hemochromatosis diagnosis by age 80, projected from follow-up56.4%40.5%
Melbourne cohort, 2008203Documented iron overload with a related condition, such as liver fibrosis, raised liver enzymes or arthritis of the knuckles28.4%1.2%
eMERGE network, USA, 201598A hemochromatosis diagnosis in the medical record24.4%14.0%
UK Biobank, 20242,902A diagnosis already made at recruitment, mean age 5712.1%3.4%
UK Biobank, 20242,902Liver fibrosis or cirrhosis by age 807.7%1.9%
US health appraisal clinic, 2002152Signs and symptoms suggesting hemochromatosis: 1 of 152, one estimate for both sexesunder 1%under 1%

Source: HEIRS[17]; UK Biobank[16]; Melbourne[15]; eMERGE[18]; US clinic[14]. In UK Biobank, liver fibrosis or cirrhosis by 80 was 1.3% in men and 0.8% in women without either variant[16].

Figure 5. The table as a chart. The lines on the Melbourne figures are that study's 95 percent confidence intervals[15]; the other studies' intervals are not drawn. Each row answers a different question.

Three things move the number. One is the definition: a raised ferritin is common in homozygous men, 88 percent in the HEIRS screening, while organ damage is much rarer[17, 16]. Another is age. In UK Biobank, 12.1 percent of homozygous men had a diagnosis at recruitment, at a mean age of 57, and 56.4 percent were projected to have one by 80[16]; counted a third way, as the share with a diagnosis anywhere in the records, the same cohort gives 24.8 percent of homozygotes[9]. The last is who was studied: the clinic study left out people already diagnosed, and UK Biobank volunteers were somewhat healthier than the population they came from[16]. A review pooling several sources put the lifetime risk of cirrhosis or liver cancer at roughly 1 in 10 homozygous men whose iron goes untreated[19].

A diagnosis is also a different thing from harm, and UK Biobank measured harm separately. By 80, homozygous men had more liver disease than men without either variant, 20.3 against 8.3 percent, more joint replacements, 27.9 against 17.1 percent, and more deaths, 33.1 against 25.4 percent. Men not yet diagnosed at recruitment showed much the same excess. Homozygous women had more liver disease, 8.9 against 6.8 percent, and more joint replacements, and no excess of deaths[16]. In women the disease comes later, because menstruation removes iron[9], and symptoms usually begin after menopause[1].

H63D measures milder than it sounds

H63D is the more common of the two variants and the weaker. A population study in Busselton, Western Australia, took 2,531 people without C282Y: 62 had two copies of H63D and 711 had one. H63D raised transferrin saturation, and men with two copies were more likely than men without it to have both a high saturation and a ferritin of 300 µg/L or more, 9 against 0.7 percent. None had clinically significant iron overload[20, 16].

UK Biobank's figures point the same way. A hemochromatosis diagnosis by 80 was projected for 1.9 percent of men and 0.6 percent of women with two copies of H63D, and for 5.4 and 2.7 percent of people with one copy of each variant. Neither group had an excess of deaths, liver disease or any other outcome studied that survived the study's correction for multiple testing[16]. A 2022 working group of the BIOIRON Society, the international society for iron research, wrote that the compound genotype has "minimal or no clinical penetrance" and cannot be taken as diagnostic[21].

Finland carries C282Y at about half the European rate

C282Y is a northern European variant, and it is not spread evenly even there. In the gnomAD database, 3.6 percent of Finnish chromosomes carry it, against 6.5 percent of non-Finnish European ones; among East Asians it is close to absent[24]. FinnGen, with genotypes and health records for about 420,000 Finns, measured 3.7 percent, against 7.4 percent in UK Biobank[9]. H63D goes the same way, 9.6 against 15.0 percent[25].

3.6%

of Finnish chromosomes carry C282Y in gnomAD's genomes[24]

6.5%

of non-Finnish European chromosomes do[24]

1 in 790

Finns expected to carry two copies, our estimate from the 3.6%[24]

Figure 6. C282Y allele frequency in the gnomAD v4 genomes[24]. Groups with fewer than 1,000 chromosomes sequenced, and the group of unassigned ancestry, are left out.

Within Finland the blood service found C282Y in every region, most often in Åland and South Ostrobothnia and least often in Kainuu, the region where the same study found rare Finnish-enriched disease variants most concentrated[27]. A Finn with two copies is about as likely to be diagnosed as a Briton with two: 20.2 percent of homozygotes in FinnGen had a registry diagnosis, against 24.8 percent in UK Biobank counted the same way[9].

Diagnoses overall were rarer in Finland, 0.1 percent of FinnGen participants against 0.4 percent in UK Biobank, and the FinnGen authors read the gap as a sign that the condition may be under-recognised in Finland[9]. The gap alone does not settle that. A recessive genotype at half the allele frequency is expected to be about four times rarer, because the frequency is squared, and four times is the gap observed. That reading is our arithmetic; the authors also drew on what earlier diagnoses predicted in their models[9].

Where the genotype stops and the blood test starts

A genotype says what could happen to iron levels; blood measurements say what has. For people with two copies of C282Y, the European Association for the Study of the Liver's 2022 guideline treats a transferrin saturation above 45 percent with ferritin above 200 µg/L in women, or above 50 percent with ferritin above 300 µg/L in men and postmenopausal women, as enough to diagnose hemochromatosis. For other HFE genotypes it requires iron in the liver to be shown by MRI or biopsy[8]. The same guideline describes phlebotomy, the regular removal of blood, as the treatment, and says early diagnosis and treatment can prevent cirrhosis, liver cancer, diabetes and joint disease[8].

Where the genotype was found first, the iron was often already up. In the HEIRS screening study, 88 percent of homozygous men and 57 percent of homozygous women who had never been diagnosed had ferritin above the study's cut-offs[17]. At Geisinger, a US health system whose biobank returns selected sequencing results to participants, 201 people learned they had two copies of C282Y. Fifty-seven already had a diagnosis; of the other 144, 53 turned out to have iron overload[28].

What our report says, file by file

Every report built from a chip export, a VCF or a gVCF has an HFE card. What it can say depends on the file, and the card names the variant it could not read rather than leaving it out.

Table 2. How the HFE card reads each kind of file
Chip exportVCF or gVCF
C282YRead, if the chip has a row for itRead
H63DRead as one copy from a CG row; a CC or GG row is marked as not examinedRead
One copy of C282YReported; with a CC or GG row at H63D, a note says a compound C282Y/H63D result is not ruled outReported; a missing H63D record is labelled an inference
Two copies of C282YReported; an unread H63D cannot change itReported
Neither variant foundNo C282Y; H63D not examined unless the row reads CGBoth read as the reference letter and labelled an inference

Source: The report's HFE module as of October 2026. The chip column follows from the strand problem described above[12].

Beside the genotype the card gives the penetrance note and says plainly that the result is a risk factor, not a diagnosis and not a measurement of iron. The sample report shows the card in full, and the free file check tells you whether a file is a chip export or a sequencing file before anything is paid for.

What Aimosti would (and wouldn't) show you

The report's HFE card reads C282Y and H63D from a VCF or gVCF, and from a chip reads C282Y plus an H63D row only when it reads CG. It names the genotype and says the result is a risk factor, not a measure of iron. From a chip with a CC or GG row at H63D it marks H63D as not examined and says when that leaves a compound C282Y/H63D result open. A variant missing from a plain VCF is read as the reference letter and labelled as an inference.

What we won't claim

We won't turn an HFE genotype into a personal chance of disease, read H63D from chip data, or present any HFE result as a diagnosis. A genotype says what could happen to iron levels; only a blood test says what has.

Bottom line. Two copies of C282Y is the HFE result that carries real weight, more for men than for women and more with age; its published penetrance runs from under 1 to 56 percent because studies counted different things. One copy of C282Y, two copies of H63D, or one of each has shown little or no excess disease in the largest cohort.

Questions people ask

Does 23andMe test for hemochromatosis?

Yes. Its Hereditary Hemochromatosis (HFE-Related) report covers C282Y and H63D, says the variants are best studied in people of European descent, and is not intended to diagnose any disease[3]. In the raw download, C282Y can be read directly; H63D runs into the strand problem described above.

Does one copy of C282Y cause hemochromatosis?

In the large population studies, one copy on its own has shown very little. In the Melbourne cohort, the only person with documented iron-overload disease who did not have two copies of C282Y had one copy of each variant[15]. In UK Biobank, the only association for a single copy that survived correction for multiple testing was a slight excess of skin and soft-tissue infections in men[16]. One copy is carrier status, which matters for children (what carrier status means).

What does a C282Y/H63D result mean?

One copy of each variant, called compound heterozygosity. In UK Biobank, 5.4 percent of men and 2.7 percent of women with it were projected to have a hemochromatosis diagnosis by 80, with no excess of any outcome that survived correction for multiple testing[16]. The BIOIRON Society's 2022 classification puts its penetrance at minimal or none and does not count it as diagnostic[21].

Can you have hemochromatosis without the HFE variants?

Yes. Rarer inherited forms come from other genes, HJV, HAMP, TFR2 and SLC40A1[1], and iron overload from other conditions can lead to the same diagnosis[9]. In FinnGen, 75 percent of people with a hemochromatosis diagnosis carried C282Y or H63D, against 88.6 percent in UK Biobank[9].

Why is hemochromatosis less common in women?

Menstruation removes iron, so women build it up more slowly[9], and symptoms usually start after menopause rather than between 40 and 60 as in men[1]. Most studies find a large gap, sized by what they counted: 1.2 against 28.4 percent for documented disease in Melbourne[15], 40.5 against 56.4 percent for a diagnosis by 80 in UK Biobank[16]. FinnGen's registry data are an exception, showing no clear difference by sex up to age 90[9].

Is hemochromatosis common in Finland?

Less common than in most of northern Europe. C282Y is on 3.6 percent of Finnish chromosomes against 6.5 percent of other European ones[24], which puts two copies at roughly 1 in 790 Finns by our estimate. Recorded diagnoses were 0.1 percent of FinnGen participants, a quarter of the UK Biobank rate[9].

References

  1. Hereditary hemochromatosis. MedlinePlus Genetics, US National Library of Medicine, 2019.
  2. Feder JN, Gnirke A, Thomas W, et al. A novel MHC class I-like gene is mutated in patients with hereditary haemochromatosis. Nature Genetics, 1996. doi:10.1038/ng0896-399
  3. Hereditary hemochromatosis. 23andMe. Read 10 October 2026: the Hereditary Hemochromatosis (HFE-Related) report is indicated for the C282Y and H63D variants.
  4. HFE gene. MedlinePlus Genetics, US National Library of Medicine, 2019.
  5. Brissot P, Pietrangelo A, Adams PC, de Graaff B, McLaren CE, Loréal O. Haemochromatosis. Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 2018. doi:10.1038/nrdp.2018.16
  6. Hunter HN, Fulton DB, Ganz T, Vogel HJ. The solution structure of human hepcidin, a peptide hormone with antimicrobial activity that is involved in iron uptake and hereditary hemochromatosis. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2002. doi:10.1074/jbc.M205305200 Structure deposited as Protein Data Bank entry 1M4F, hepcidin-25.
  7. Jordan JB, Poppe L, Haniu M, et al. Hepcidin revisited, disulfide connectivity, dynamics, and structure. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2009. doi:10.1074/jbc.M109.017764
  8. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on haemochromatosis. Journal of Hepatology, 2022. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2022.03.033
  9. Toivonen J, Clancy J, FinnGen, Åberg F, Ritari J, Arvas M. Quantifying risk modifiers of hereditary hemochromatosis using genomic and electronic health record data. JHEP Reports, 2026. doi:10.1016/j.jhepr.2026.101774
  10. Variant rs1800562 (HFE C282Y). Ensembl. GRCh38 6:26092913 G>A; GRCh37 6:26093141. Read through the Ensembl REST service, 10 October 2026.
  11. Variant rs1799945 (HFE H63D). Ensembl. GRCh38 6:26090951 C>G; GRCh37 6:26091179. Read through the Ensembl REST service, 10 October 2026.
  12. Deelen P, Bonder MJ, van der Velde KJ, et al. Genotype harmonizer: automatic strand alignment and format conversion for genotype data integration. BMC Research Notes, 2014. doi:10.1186/1756-0500-7-901
  13. The Variant Call Format Specification, VCFv4.3. GA4GH / hts-specs, 2025.
  14. Beutler E, Felitti VJ, Koziol JA, Ho NJ, Gelbart T. Penetrance of 845G→A (C282Y) HFE hereditary haemochromatosis mutation in the USA. The Lancet, 2002. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07447-0
  15. Allen KJ, Gurrin LC, Constantine CC, et al. Iron-overload-related disease in HFE hereditary hemochromatosis. New England Journal of Medicine, 2008. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa073286
  16. Lucas MR, Atkins JL, Pilling LC, Shearman JD, Melzer D. HFE genotypes, haemochromatosis diagnosis and clinical outcomes at age 80 years: a prospective cohort study in the UK Biobank. BMJ Open, 2024. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081926
  17. Adams PC, Reboussin DM, Barton JC, et al. Hemochromatosis and iron-overload screening in a racially diverse population. New England Journal of Medicine, 2005. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa041534
  18. Gallego CJ, Burt A, Sundaresan AS, et al. Penetrance of hemochromatosis in HFE genotypes resulting in p.Cys282Tyr and p.[Cys282Tyr];[His63Asp] in the eMERGE Network. American Journal of Human Genetics, 2015. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.08.008
  19. Grosse SD, Gurrin LC, Bertalli NA, Allen KJ. Clinical penetrance in hereditary hemochromatosis: estimates of the cumulative incidence of severe liver disease among HFE C282Y homozygotes. Genetics in Medicine, 2018. doi:10.1038/gim.2017.121
  20. Gochee PA, Powell LW, Cullen DJ, Du Sart D, Rossi E, Olynyk JK. A population-based study of the biochemical and clinical expression of the H63D hemochromatosis mutation. Gastroenterology, 2002. doi:10.1016/S0016-5085(02)80116-0
  21. Girelli D, Busti F, Brissot P, Cabantchik I, Muckenthaler MU, Porto G. Hemochromatosis classification: update and recommendations by the BIOIRON Society. Blood, 2022. doi:10.1182/blood.2021011338
  22. Rs1799945(G;G). SNPedia. Page revision of 23 February 2015, read through the SNPedia API on 10 October 2026.
  23. Promethease. promethease.com. Describes itself as connecting a file of genotypes to the findings cited in SNPedia; read 10 October 2026.
  24. gnomAD v4: variant 6-26092913-G-A (rs1800562, HFE C282Y). Genome Aggregation Database, 2026. Genomes, read 10 October 2026: Finnish 378 of 10,618 alleles; non-Finnish European 4,398 of 68,010; admixed American 284 of 15,296; Ashkenazi Jewish 48 of 3,470; African/African American 459 of 41,560; South Asian 11 of 4,832; East Asian 2 of 5,178.
  25. gnomAD v4: variant 6-26090951-C-G (rs1799945, HFE H63D). Genome Aggregation Database, 2026. Genomes, read 10 October 2026: Finnish 1,015 of 10,580 alleles; non-Finnish European 10,219 of 67,976.
  26. Clancy J, Forstén J, Koskinen E, Arvas M, Åberg F, Pitkänen K, Castrén J. Biobank participants' perspectives on receiving genetic risk information from a biobank: the case of haemochromatosis. BMC Medical Genomics, 2025. doi:10.1186/s12920-025-02285-3
  27. Clancy J, Ritari J, Vaittinen E, et al. Blood donor biobank as a resource in personalised biomedical genetic research. European Journal of Human Genetics, 2024. doi:10.1038/s41431-023-01528-0
  28. Savatt JM, Johns A, Schwartz MLB, et al. Testing and management of iron overload after genetic screening-identified hemochromatosis. JAMA Network Open, 2023. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.38995

Last reviewed . Every number on this page links to the source it comes from; if one of them has moved, tell us.

This is the kind of answer we give. See what your file says.

See a sample report Get your report · $39