ClinVar 2026-07: 951 records inside our regions changed classification since 2026-05. What changed
Sample report Support Log in
aimostı Check your file

Learn Explainer

Night owl genes: what CRY1, PER3 and 351 chronotype loci can tell you

Whether you are a morning or an evening person is partly inherited, and a 2019 study of 697,828 people found 351 places in the genome that nudge it. Each nudge is tiny. The two famous single-gene night-owl and early-bird variants, found in families, shift sleep by a few minutes in the general population.

Key takeaways

  • Twin studies attribute about half of the differences in chronotype to genes; in 8,753 Finnish twin pairs the estimate was 49.7 percent[1].
  • A 2019 genome-wide study of 697,828 people found 351 chronotype regions. On wrist monitors, the 5 percent of people carrying the most morning-linked variants had their quietest hours of the night 25 minutes earlier, on average, than the 5 percent carrying the fewest[2].
  • A score built from those regions explained 1.3 to 1.9 percent of chronotype in Finnish adults[3].
  • The CRY1 night-owl variant and the PER3 early-bird pair shifted sleep by an hour or more in the families that brought them to light, and by about 5 and 7 minutes in UK Biobank carriers[4].
  • The CRY1 variant is about 16 times rarer in Finns than in other Europeans; the PER3 pair is about five times more common, yet Finnish carriers did not call themselves morning people more often[12, 13, 4].

Twin studies put the inherited share of chronotype, a person's leaning towards early or late sleep, at about half: 49.7 percent in 8,753 Finnish twin pairs[1]. The largest genome-wide study, of 697,828 people in UK Biobank and 23andMe, found 351 regions linked to being a morning person[2]. Summed into one score, those regions explained 1.3 to 1.9 percent of the differences in chronotype between Finnish adults[3]. Rare variants in CRY1 and PER3 moved sleep by an hour or more in the families where they were found, and by about 5 to 7 minutes in the general population[4].

Chronotype is about half inherited

Chronotype is usually measured by asking. The Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire scores the times people would choose for sleep, work and exercise; large genetic studies use a single question, whether you are a morning or an evening person[3, 2]. Age, sex and the light people live in account for a large part of the variation, and genes for part of it[2].

Twins give the first estimate of how large that genetic part is. In 1981 the Older Finnish Twin Cohort answered a four-step question on diurnal type: 2,836 identical and 5,917 non-identical same-sex pairs. Genetic effects accounted for 49.7 percent of the differences between people, with the rest put down to environments the twins did not share. Most of the genetic share, 38.0 percent, came from dominance, the way the two copies of a gene combine, and 11.7 percent from additive effects[1]. Other twin studies range from 37 to 54 percent[3].

Terms this article relies on

Chronotype
A person's leaning towards earlier or later sleep and activity, from a definite morning type to a definite evening type[2].
Delayed and advanced sleep phase
A body clock running hours later or earlier than the social day. Families were reported in which the delayed form follows a CRY1 variant and the advanced form variants in PER2, PER3, CRY2, CSNK1D or TIMELESS[4].
Sleep midpoint and L5 timing
Two ways a wrist activity monitor times sleep: the middle of the night's sleep, and the middle of the five least active hours of the day[4].

351 regions from 697,828 people

Earlier genome-wide studies, of up to 128,286 people, had found 24 chronotype loci. In 2019 Jones and colleagues combined 449,734 UK Biobank participants with 248,098 research participants of 23andMe, all of European ancestry, and found 351[2]. UK Biobank asked one question with five answers, and the spread of answers is the trait the study was measuring.

Figure 1. The answers behind the 351 loci, from the European-ancestry participants of UK Biobank. More than half leaned towards morning; 8 percent called themselves definite evening people. Shares are our arithmetic from the study's table[2].

Among the strongest signals were genes of the body clock itself: PER2, PER3, FBXL3, and for the first time PER1, CRY1 and ARNTL. The loci were also enriched for genes active in the retina, the hypothalamus and the pituitary, and two of them, RGS16 and INADL, act in the retinal cells that report light to the brain's master clock[2]. Part of being a night owl may be how strongly the eye passes on daylight.

Self-report can mislead, so the study checked the loci against wrist activity monitors worn by 85,760 participants. The variants moved the timing of sleep and showed little link with its length or quality. The 5 percent of people carrying the most morning-linked variants had the middle of their five least active hours at 03:06, against 03:32 for the 5 percent carrying the fewest: 25.1 minutes earlier on average[2].

697,828

people in the 2019 chronotype genome-wide study[2]

351

regions linked to being a morning person, up from 24[2]

25 minutes

average gap in night-time rest between the 5% with the most and the fewest morning-linked variants[2]

Counting only the common variants that genotyping chips capture, chronotype heritability in UK Biobank was 13.7 percent, at the lower end of earlier estimates of 12 to 21 percent[2]. The gap between that and the twin figure is usual for complex traits; our guide to polygenic scores in plain words explains where it comes from.

What a chronotype score explains

A polygenic score adds up a person's morning- or evening-linked variants, each weighted by its effect. Maukonen and colleagues built one from 313 of the 351 lead variants and tested it in 8,433 Finns of the FINRISK 2007 and 2012 surveys, who had answered both the single question and six items of the full questionnaire. A higher score went with being an evening type on both measures. It explained 1.39 percent of the questionnaire score and 1.89 percent of the single-question answer[3, 5].

Figure 2. Three answers to how much of chronotype is genetic. They come from different people and methods, so they line up as orders of magnitude, not as one calculation[1, 2, 3].

None of the 313 variants on its own was linked to chronotype in the Finnish sample, although most pointed the same way as in the large study[3]. That is what a score of tiny effects looks like in 8,000 people: the signal exists only in the sum.

CRY1 and PER3: the family variants

The night-owl gene of the headlines is a change in CRY1, one of the brakes of the molecular clock. Patke and colleagues studied a 46-year-old woman with delayed sleep phase disorder. In the laboratory her evening melatonin rise came at 2:32 am, where 8 to 10 pm is typical, and during 14 days without clocks or daylight her sleep-wake rhythm ran on a 24.5-hour cycle, against 24.2 hours in a control subject[6].

She carried c.1657+3A>C (rs184039278), a change at a splice site that makes cells skip exon 11, 72 letters long, and build CRY1 without 24 of its amino acids. The shortened protein bound the clock's activators more tightly and lengthened the cycle in cell experiments. Late sleep ran through her family in a dominant pattern, and in six unrelated Turkish families of 70 people, 38 carriers reported disturbed sleep, late or broken, while their non-carrier relatives did not[6]. Some of the same researchers later linked the variant to ADHD, starting from families selected for having both ADHD and insomnia[7].

The early-bird counterpart is a pair of changes in PER3, P415A and H417R, inherited together. They were found in people with familial advanced sleep phase who also scored higher on questionnaires about low and seasonal mood. Mice carrying the human version shifted their sleep-wake cycle when days were kept short[8].

Families come to attention because their members are extreme, so a variant can look stronger there than in carriers found at random. In 2022 Weedon and colleagues looked up the reported sleep variants in up to 191,929 people with sleep data and sequence data, from UK Biobank, two Finnish cohorts and a US study. In UK Biobank none was linked to a recorded sleep disorder or to sleep medication. Only CRY1 and PER3 moved sleep timing at all[4].

Figure 3. The same variants in the families that brought them to light and in the general population. Family figures as the 2022 study summarised them; population figures are differences in sleep midpoint measured by wrist monitors in UK Biobank[4].
Table 1. The two family variants in UK Biobank
VariantCarriers' answerCarriersNon-carriersSleep midpoint
CRY1 c.1657+3A>CDefinitely an evening person10.1%7.9%5.4 min later (P = 0.06)
PER3 P415A/H417RDefinitely a morning person29.6%23.8%6.8 min earlier (P = 0.01)

Source: Weedon et al. 2022, Tables 4 and 5: heterozygous carriers against non-carriers among unrelated European-ancestry participants[4].

Both effects are small. The PER3 carriers' higher odds of calling themselves definite morning people, 1.36, passed genome-wide significance; the CRY1 difference in sleep midpoint just missed the usual 0.05 threshold. In the same study, 64 people carrying one of 50 different PER2 variants that cut the protein short had a sleep midpoint about 57 minutes earlier, the one large effect the population search turned up[4].

MEIS1: restless legs, broken sleep and a little eveningness

Restless legs syndrome is an urge to move the legs, with unpleasant sensations, that comes on at rest and is worse in the evening and at night; it affects up to 10 percent of people of European ancestry[9]. The first genome-wide study of it, in 2007, found variants in MEIS1, a developmental gene, among three regions that each raised risk by more than 50 percent[10].

A 2017 meta-analysis of 15,126 cases and 95,725 controls, replicated in 30,770 cases and 286,913 controls, confirmed MEIS1 as the strongest genetic factor. Its lead variant, rs113851554 in intron 8, carried an odds ratio of 1.92 per copy[9]. The same allele turns up in insomnia studies with odds ratios of 1.14 to 1.27, and in the 2019 chronotype study, where its other allele went with slightly higher odds of being a morning person, 1.06[11]. Part of the insomnia signal may be people kept awake by their legs.

Finland: a rare CRY1, a common PER3

The three variants are spread very unevenly. In gnomAD's genome data, the PER3 pair is about five times as common in Finns as in other Europeans, and the CRY1 variant about 16 times rarer, with 3 copies in 10,626 Finnish chromosomes. MEIS1's restless-legs allele is also more common in Finland[12, 13, 14].

Table 2. How common each variant is, Finnish and non-Finnish European genomes
VariantFinnish allele frequencyNon-Finnish EuropeanFinns with at least one copy (estimate)
CRY1 c.1657+3A>C (rs184039278)0.028%0.456%about 1 in 1,800
PER3 H417R (rs139315125)2.90%0.569%about 1 in 17
MEIS1 rs113851554 T8.36%5.61%about 1 in 6

Source: gnomAD v4.1 genomes, read 10 October 2026[12, 13, 14]. The last column is our estimate, 1 − (1 − p)², assuming random mating.

Common in Finland did not mean visible in Finns. In the FINRISK and Health 2000 to 2011 cohorts, 22.8 percent of the 149 PER3 carriers called themselves definite morning people, against 22.4 percent of non-carriers. Fewer than five CRY1 carriers were found, and none of them answered definitely evening[4]. Both samples were small.

Light matters too. One test of latitude comes from Brazil, where 12,884 people in one time zone, from the equator to 32 degrees south, became more evening-type with distance from the equator[15]. That study stopped far short of Finland's 60 to 70 degrees north, and none of the studies cited here tests latitude within Finland. Among 18,087 Finnish men in four surveys, 9.5 percent were evening types after age standardisation, and morning types were less common in the 2000s than two decades earlier[16].

One older candidate still circulates. A CLOCK variant, 3111T/C (rs1801260), was linked to eveningness in candidate-gene studies that were small and inconsistent[3], but the GWAS Catalog lists no genome-wide association for it with any trait[17].

What the Aimosti report shows

Chronotype appears in three places in the report. The Traits section, in the well-supported tier, reads rs12927162 near CASC16, a locus found in the 23andMe study of 89,283 people and again in the 2019 study, and labels the genotype a morning, intermediate or evening tendency[18]. Below the credibility firewall, the emerging scores include the 311-variant chronotype score, which ships 311 of PGS000336's 313 variants and ranks your file against a European reference[5]. A higher percentile means a tendency towards evening, and the card states that it explains roughly 1 to 2 percent of chronotype.

The Frontier, in the same exploratory tier, holds the single-gene cards: CRY1 (labelled mixed evidence), PER3 and MEIS1 (replicated, small effect) and CLOCK 3111T/C (contested). Two short-sleeper cards and a caffeine-and-sleep card sit in the same group; the caffeine side is in our guide to caffeine and CYP1A2. Whether a card can be read depends on the file.

Table 3. What each file type gives the sleep and chronotype cards
FileSingle-variant cards (trait, CRY1, PER3, MEIS1, CLOCK)Chronotype score
Chip exportRead where the chip carries the marker. CRY1 is on none of the ten chip exports we checked, PER3 on three, MEIS1 on one; an absent marker is left unresolved, shown as not read.Scored from the variants the chip carries; at least 50 percent are needed for a result, and 90 percent for an exact percentile.
Plain VCFA missing record is read as the common genotype, with a note that this is an inference.Shown as an approximate percentile, because the file cannot show which positions were covered.
gVCFA reference block with 10 or more reads proves the common genotype; without one, the card carries the same inference note.Exact percentile when at least 90 percent of the variants sit in callable reads.
BAM or CRAM (Deep Read)Not read. Deep Read covers drug-response genes, read depth and HLA; these cards come from the VCF or gVCF.Not computed from the reads.

Source: Aimosti report logic and card content as of 10 October 2026; the per-chip counts are the report team's checks on ten real chip exports, recorded with each card.

No card turns a genotype into advice about sleep or a sleep diagnosis, and none of them says anything about mood: the PER3 card notes that its family's mood scores have not been seen in the general population. Where a marker could not be read, the report says so instead of showing the common genotype as a result. Why that distinction matters is in what a missing VCF record means.

What Aimosti would (and wouldn't) show you

From a chip export, a plain VCF or a gVCF, the report shows a chronotype trait card (rs12927162), a 311-variant emerging chronotype score, and Frontier cards for CRY1, PER3, MEIS1 and CLOCK, each with an evidence label. A chip leaves a marker it does not carry unresolved; a plain VCF reads a missing record as the common genotype and says so; a gVCF can prove the position was read. A BAM or CRAM Deep Read reads none of these sleep markers.

What we won't claim

We won't tell anyone when to sleep, diagnose delayed or advanced sleep phase, insomnia or restless legs syndrome, or describe a reader's personality from a genotype. A chronotype score is a rank against a reference group, and it explains about 1 to 2 percent of the differences between people.

Bottom line. Chronotype is about half inherited in twin studies, but the inheritance is spread over hundreds of variants with effects of a minute or two each. Even the CRY1 and PER3 family variants shift sleep by only 5 to 7 minutes when found in the general population. A DNA file can rank a tendency; it cannot read anyone's body clock.

Questions people ask

Is being a night owl genetic?

Partly. Twin studies attribute about half of the differences in chronotype to genes, 49.7 percent in Finnish twins[1]. The genetic part is spread over hundreds of variants: a 2019 study of 697,828 people found 351 regions, each with a small effect[2]. Age, sex and light account for much of the rest.

What is the CRY1 mutation?

A change at a splice site of CRY1, c.1657+3A>C (rs184039278), that removes 24 amino acids from the protein and lengthens the body clock's cycle in cell experiments. It was found in families with delayed sleep phase disorder[6]. In UK Biobank its carriers slept about 5 minutes later on average and were slightly more likely to call themselves definite evening people[4].

Can a DNA test tell whether I am a morning person?

Not reliably. The best-tested chronotype score explained 1.3 to 1.9 percent of the differences between Finnish adults[3], so a person's own answer to the morning-or-evening question measures directly what the score only estimates. A score ranks a genetic tendency against a reference group.

Why is the PER3 variant so common in Finland?

The studies cited here do not explain it. The pair is carried on 2.9 percent of Finnish chromosomes against 0.57 percent in other Europeans[13]. Many variants differ in frequency between Finns and other Europeans because of the population's history, which our page on the Finnish disease heritage describes.

Does the MEIS1 variant mean restless legs syndrome?

No. Restless legs syndrome is recognised from symptoms. The allele roughly doubles the odds per copy in genome-wide studies, and the syndrome affects up to 10 percent of people of European ancestry[9], so by our arithmetic most carriers do not have it. About 1 in 6 Finns carries at least one copy, by our estimate from gnomAD[14].

References

  1. Koskenvuo M, Hublin C, Partinen M, Heikkilä K, Kaprio J. Heritability of diurnal type: a nationwide study of 8753 adult twin pairs. Journal of Sleep Research, 2007. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2869.2007.00580.x Older Finnish Twin Cohort, 2,836 MZ and 5,917 DZ pairs; broad-sense heritability 49.7% (additive 11.7%, dominance 38.0%).
  2. Jones SE, Lane JM, Wood AR, et al. Genome-wide association analyses of chronotype in 697,828 individuals provides insights into circadian rhythms. Nature Communications, 2019. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-08259-7 351 loci; UK Biobank 449,734 and 23andMe 248,098; SNP heritability 13.7%; L5 timing 03:06 vs 03:32 (25.1 min) between the top and bottom 5% of a 292-variant score in 85,760 people; answer counts from Table 1.
  3. Maukonen M, Havulinna AS, Männistö S, Kanerva N, Salomaa V, Partonen T. Genetic associations of chronotype in the Finnish general population. Journal of Biological Rhythms, 2020. doi:10.1177/0748730420935328 8,433 FINRISK 2007 and 2012 participants; 313-SNP score: R² 0.01387 (sMEQ), Nagelkerke 0.01312 (binary sMEQ) and 0.01893 (single item).
  4. Weedon MN, Jones SE, Lane JM, et al. The impact of Mendelian sleep and circadian genetic variants in a population setting. PLoS Genetics, 2022. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1010356 Tables 4 and 5: PER3 carriers 29.6% vs 23.8% definitely morning, sleep midpoint 6.8 min earlier; CRY1 carriers 10.1% vs 7.9% definitely evening, 5.4 min later; Finnish PER3 carriers 22.8% vs 22.4%.
  5. PGS000336 (GRS313_Chron): score and performance metrics. PGS Catalog, 2020. 313 variants, weights ln(OR); evaluated in 7,436 and 8,433 FINRISK participants.
  6. Patke A, Murphy PJ, Onat OE, et al. Mutation of the human circadian clock gene CRY1 in familial delayed sleep phase disorder. Cell, 2017. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.03.027
  7. Onat OE, Kars ME, Gül Ş, et al. Human CRY1 variants associate with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 2020. doi:10.1172/JCI135500
  8. Zhang L, Hirano A, Hsu PK, et al. A PERIOD3 variant causes a circadian phenotype and is associated with a seasonal mood trait. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2016. doi:10.1073/pnas.1600039113
  9. Schormair B, Zhao C, Bell S, et al. Identification of novel risk loci for restless legs syndrome in genome-wide association studies in individuals of European ancestry: a meta-analysis. The Lancet Neurology, 2017. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30327-7 rs113851554, MEIS1 intron 8: joint OR 1.92 (1.85 to 1.99), P 2 × 10⁻²⁸⁰.
  10. Winkelmann J, Schormair B, Lichtner P, et al. Genome-wide association study of restless legs syndrome identifies common variants in three genomic regions. Nature Genetics, 2007. doi:10.1038/ng2099
  11. Associations of rs113851554 (MEIS1). NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog, 2026. Read 10 October 2026: insomnia OR 1.14 (GCST007387/8), 1.229 (GCST007988) and 1.27 (GCST004702); chronotype, rs113851554-G OR 1.055 for morning (GCST007576, Jones 2019).
  12. Variant 12-106992962-T-G (CRY1, rs184039278). gnomAD v4.1, 2026. Genomes, read 10 October 2026: Finnish 3 of 10,626 alleles; non-Finnish European 310 of 68,020.
  13. Variant 1-7809900-A-G (PER3 H417R, rs139315125). gnomAD v4.1, 2026. Genomes, read 10 October 2026: Finnish 308 of 10,618 alleles; non-Finnish European 387 of 68,032. P415A (1-7809893-C-G) has the same counts in Finns.
  14. Variant 2-66523432-G-T (MEIS1, rs113851554). gnomAD v4.1, 2026. Genomes, read 10 October 2026: Finnish 886 of 10,604 alleles; non-Finnish European 3,814 of 68,028.
  15. Leocadio-Miguel MA, Louzada FM, Duarte LL, et al. Latitudinal cline of chronotype. Scientific Reports, 2017. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-05797-w
  16. Broms U, Pitkäniemi J, Bäckmand H, et al. Long-term consistency of diurnal-type preferences among men. Chronobiology International, 2014. doi:10.3109/07420528.2013.836534
  17. Associations of rs1801260 (CLOCK 3111T/C). NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog, 2026. Read 10 October 2026: no associations listed.
  18. Associations of rs12927162. NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog, 2026. Read 10 October 2026: morning chronotype, A allele, OR 1.10 in Hu et al. 2016 (89,283 23andMe participants, GCST003429) and 1.06 in Jones et al. 2019 (GCST007576).

Last reviewed . Every number on this page links to the source it comes from; if one of them has moved, tell us.

This is the kind of answer we give. See what your file says.

See a sample report Get your report · $39